CollegeEducation should not be Free
Therehave been numerous debates about whether public colleges should betuition free or not. The proponents argue that many bright studentsfail to join colleges due to lack of school fees. Others dispute thatthe students fail exams since they spend most of their time doingpart time jobs to raise money for their fees. Consequently, thedebaters conclude that the majority of students who fail can ace thetests if they had a chance to attend college free of charge. Giventhis new body of evidence, one is tempted to campaign for the collegeeducation to be tuition free. However, college tuition fees shouldnot be scraped because it would be impossible to sustain qualitylearning environment in public institutions.
First,colleges rely on the money contributed by students to carry out theirdaily activities. Public institutions work semi-autonomously, andthey only receive meager funding from the government that cannotfully cater for all the college functions. For example, thegovernment can pay the tutors and provide funds for establishing theinstitutions (Kelly, 2013). Institutions pick up from that point anddevelop other facilities to cater for the increasing number ofstudents. When students enter colleges, they expect to findwell-established classes, laboratories, and other auxiliaryfacilities. Without the fees paid by the students, it would bedifficult to provide a conducive learning environment.
Secondly,paying college fees gives parents and students a feeling ofattachment to institutions. When people pay college fees, they feelthe effect of the burden. Parents feel proud when they financiallycontribute to their children’s education (Kelly, 2013). Therefore,they all make a team that ensures that the money they contribute donot go to waste. Students work hard to avoid repeating courses thatwould attract extra fees to pay for supplementary exams. According toKelly (2013), the overall result is a community of committed studentsand parents. If the colleges were free, the morale that the parentsand the learners have would reduce significantly. The burden raisedfrom the students and parents shoulders would see them become lax,and the result would be poor performing students and unconcernedparents.
Anotherreason college education should not be tuition-free is that collegeshave independent internal structures that differ from one college toanother. The administration of every college decides the number ofsupport staff to employ and how to remunerate them (Kelly, 2013).These employees are critical in providing a serene learningenvironment customized to meet the needs of learners from differentbackgrounds. Without college fees, the number of support staff canonly have dictated by the amount of money received from thegovernment (Kelly, 2013). Colleges may have to forego some of theactivities, and this can affect the quality of life in theinstitutions.
Conclusively,students should not be exempted from paying school fees because itcan be difficult for institutions to maintain a quality learningenvironment. Colleges need to expand their facilities to accommodatethe increasing number of students. Also, school fees contribute tothe feeling of attachment and it triggers hard work among students.The quality of education consequently improves unlike in a situationwhere there is no burden of school fees. Finally, colleges rely onthe fees paid by the students to employ support staffs who provideauxiliary services to enhance the quality of education and life incollege. It would be unwise, therefore, to make college educationfree.
Kelly,P. (2013). Should public colleges be free? No. TheDenver Post.Retrieved fromhttp://www.denverpost.com/ci_24234548/shifting-tuition-taxpayers-may-derail-innovations